![]() It comes with a user-friendly interface and offers a range of useful features, including real-time performance monitoring, custom alerts, and automated remediation.Īnd if you’re worried about pricing, you’ll be pleased to know that SolarWinds Server & Application Monitor is competitively priced, making it an excellent value for money. What’s more, SolarWinds Server & Application Monitor is incredibly easy to use, even for those with limited technical expertise. This powerful tool offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, allowing you to identify and troubleshoot issues quickly and efficiently. I've been using LR 6 for years, and the last update, 6.14, covers my most recent camera, the G9.With SolarWinds Server & Application Monitor, you can keep a close eye on your servers and applications with ease. Take into account that if you used lightroom keywords they are not stamped on the raw fileīut the set up is very effective in general Yes you can use adobe bridge (free) for basic organisation and key wording and then it integrates with DxO. Maybe Bridge and DxO could be a pairing that would work? ![]() CR3 raw file format (just to move the files). ![]() At first glance it seems like it would do the simple organization I wanted assuming it recognizes things like Canon. Problem is LR (my old version) can't even import and organize some of my photos files as it doesn't recognize the newer RAW file formats like Canons. I've often wondered on wide lenses that have a lot of distortion if you only tried to partly correct it if you would get better results than the 'full' correction, at least for certain scenes where a little distortion wouldn't be noticed. Can Adobe Bridge or other SW you know of do that simple task?Īh, that might be useful. Honestly if it can move the files off my SD card and onto the HD organized by date then that's mostly what I need. If you retain lightroom as library it can work well but on its own is weak It does not do what lightroom and photoshop do and it needs to be used with something else. It does not make much sense to get the basic as many useful features are missing You can use a free trial version of lightroom if you like the concept of database keywording or alternatively adobe bridge that is fast and freeĭxO replaces lens correction entirely and is better plus you can tune or switch off corrections It is not that great at organising despite improvements. An everyday simple editor/organizer and something like DxO when shooting raw would be OK if that's what is needed. I'm OK using more than one product if needed. I'm not really a big photo editor either as it's not my idea of fun. Mostly shoot JPGs, but for something more serious or tricky lighting I'll shoot RAW. Is that right?Ĥ) General comments on it vs. DxO supposedly is the best at this type of stuff, just not sure how much difference it makes.ģ) From what I read it seems the Elite version is the one to get as the basic version seems to be missing a lot. I wonder if something like my PL 12-60 might actually look better on the wide end with some more sophisticated SW distortion correction. Can I download from a SD card and have it place the files on my HD sorted by date as I used to in LR(year\date folder format).Ģ) Has anyone found the lens distortion corrections to be better than what LR or most cameras do. DxO is currently 50% off.ġ) How is it for organizing your Photos. Well a PC crash recently now finds me with my photos restored on my new PC but not even wanting to load my old LR. Had been planning on getting something else to replace it as it doesn't work with my GX9 or Canon R & RP raw files. I used to use Lightroom (not the subscription version). Wondering if any people here use DxO Photolab.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |